Journals
Magazine:
BUSINESS ETHICS, THE ENVIRONMENT & RESPONSIBILITY
ISSN:
2694-6416
Year:
2023
Vol:
32
N°:
1
Pp:
274 - 291
The purpose of this paper is to show how a MacIntyre-inspired business school could contribute to developing practical wisdom in students through its curriculum, methods, faculty, student selection criteria, and governance. Despite MacIntyre's critiques, management can be presented, in MacIntyrean terms, as a second-order, domain-relative practice, with practical wisdom as corresponding virtue. Management education consists in developing practical wisdom. How? Primarily by initiating students and enabling them to participate in communal traditions of inquiry focused on, although not limited to, the purposes and ends of business. The transmission of objective knowledge, analytical skills, and techniques is subordinated to the end goal. We consider traditions centered on shareholder value maximization, the balancing of stakeholder interests, and the fulfillment of the common good of firms. Each gives rise to a particular kind of business school. A MacIntyrean business school is one that seeks the common good of firms.
Magazine:
BUSINESS ETHICS
ISSN:
0962-8770
Year:
2023
Vol:
32
N°:
1
Pp:
274 - 291
The purpose of this paper is to show how a MacIntyre-inspired business school could contribute to developing practical wisdom in students through its curriculum, meth-ods, faculty, student selection criteria, and governance. Despite MacIntyre's critiques, management can be presented, in MacIntyrean terms, as a second-order, domain- relative practice, with practical wisdom as corresponding virtue. Management education consists in developing practical wisdom. How? Primarily by initiating students and enabling them to participate in communal traditions of inquiry focused on, al-though not limited to, the purposes and ends of business. The transmission of ob-jective knowledge, analytical skills, and techniques is subordinated to the end goal. We consider traditions centered on shareholder value maximization, the balancing of stakeholder interests, and the fulfillment of the common good of firms. Each gives rise to a particular kind of business school. A MacIntyrean business school is one that seeks the common good of firms.KEYWORDScommon good, narrative, tradition, virtues
Magazine:
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS
ISSN:
0167-4544
Year:
2022
Vol:
179
N°:
1
Pp:
205 - 222
Financial misconduct has come into the spotlight in recent years, causing market regulators to increase the reach and severity of interventions.
of interventions. We show that at times the economic benefts of illicit fnancial activity outweigh the costs of litigation. We
illustrate our argument with data from the US Securities and Exchanges Commission and a case of investment misconduct.
From the neoclassical economic paradigm, which follows utilitarian thinking, it is rational to engage in misconduct. Still,
the majority of professionals refrain from misconduct, foregoing economic rewards. We suggest fnancial activity could be
reimagined taking into account intrinsic and prosocial motivations. A virtue ethics framework could also be applied, linking fnancial behavior to the quest for moral excellence and shared fourishing. By going beyond utilitarian thinking and
alternative models, we offer a fuller account of fnancial behavior and a better perspective from which to design deterrence methods.
deterrence methods.
Magazine:
BUSINESS ETHICS QUARTERLY
ISSN:
1052-150X
Year:
2021
Vol:
31
N°:
4
Pp:
623 - 639
In 1538¿39 Francisco de Vitoria delivered two relections: De Indis and De iure belli. This article distills from these writings the topic of free trade as a ¿human right¿ in accordance with ius gentium or the ¿law of peoples.¿ The right to free trade is rooted in a more fundamental right to communication and association. The rights to travel, to dwell, and to migrate precede the right to trade, which is also closely connected to the rights to preach, to protect converts, and to constitute Christian princes. This has significant repercussions on the field of business ethics: the right to free trade is ultimately founded directly on natural law and indirectly on divine law; trade is not independent of ethics; and trade is presented as an opportunity to develop the virtues of justice and friendship, among other repercussions. Vitoria is portrayed as a defender of private initiative and free markets.
Authors:
Tae Wan Kim; Fabrizio Maimone; Katherina Pattit; et al.
Magazine:
HUMANISTIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL
ISSN:
2366-6048
Magazine:
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS
ISSN:
0167-4544
Year:
2020
Vol:
161
N°:
3
Pp:
711 - 712
Magazine:
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS
ISSN:
0167-4544
In recent years, business ethics and economic scholars have been paying greater attention to the development of commons organising. The latter refers to the processes by which communities of people work in common in the pursuit of the common good. In turn, this promotes commons organisational designs based on collective forms of common goods production, distribution, management and ownership. In this paper, we build on two main literature streams: (1) the ethical approach based on the theory of the common good of the firm in virtue ethics and (2) the economic approach based on the theory of institutions for collective action developed by Ostrom's research on common-pool resources to avert the tragedy of the commons. The latter expands to include the novel concepts of new commons, "commoning" and polycentric governance. Drawing on the analysis of what is new in these forms of organizing, we propose a comprehensive model, highlighting the integration of two sets of organizing principles-common good and collective action - and five problem-solving processes to explain the main dimensions of commons organizing. We contribute to business ethics literature by exploring the convergence between the ethical and economic approaches in the development of a commons organizing view.
Magazine:
JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICS
ISSN:
1744-1374
Year:
2020
Vol:
16
N°:
5
Pp:
579 - 595
The notion that business corporations should be managed for the exclusive benefit of shareholders has been widely challenged. In particular, critics have argued that directors are authorised to serve the interests of thecorporation: a legal entity that is completely separate from its shareholders. However, the premise that shareholders have sole legitimate claim to 'membership' has rarely been questioned. This article explores medieval thought on ownership, authority and participation in guilds, churches, towns and universities, and shows that membership can be understood as participation in, and shared responsibility for, a group's distinct collaborative activity over time. Our theory suggests that 'membership' in the modern corporation extends to non-shareholding stakeholders, but with the implication that ownership and authority are vested in the members as a body and not in a separate entity.
Authors:
matthias p. hühn (Corresponding author); andré habisch; Edwin M. Hartman; et al.
Magazine:
BUSINESS ETHICS
ISSN:
0962-8770
Magazine:
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS
ISSN:
0167-4544
Year:
2020
Vol:
165
N°:
2
Pp:
241 - 254
Not only individuals and firms, but also families engage in business as a social activity and this is true beyond the case of family businesses. Cultural differences in the way families are constructed might influence the way they do business. There are different types of families, and among these are those described by Aristotelian and Confucian traditions, representing the West and the East respectively. The literature on virtue in business has been dominated by a Western-mainly Aristotelian-tradition (Ferrero and Sison in Bus Ethics Eur Rev 30(1): 8-24, 2014), neglecting the role of the family and focusing on the individual. In this paper, we seek to fill this gap by explaining differences and similarities in the normative evaluation of certain family-related business attitudes and practices, in light of Confucian and Aristotelian virtue ethics standards. After comparing the structure, organization and dynamics of Aristotelian and Confucian families, we shall draw some inferences regarding "virtuous" or excellent business practices-such as nepotism, bribery, gift-giving and guanxi and attitudes-on codified rules or written norms. For this analysis we shall make use of Aristotelian and Confucian ethical accounts as well as inputs from Family Science applied to organizations, which provides conceptual categories to compare the two traditions. Thus we hope to contribute not only to the comparative study of Aristotelian and Confucian virtue ethics in business, but also to the understanding of the distinctive role of families, raising cultural awareness for what may be considered virtuous business practices according to the Aristotelian and Confucian traditions.
Magazine:
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS
ISSN:
0167-4544
Year:
2019
Vol:
155
N°:
4
Pgs:
995 - 1007
In this article, we shall attempt to lay down the parameters within which the practice of the virtues may be enabled in the field of finance. We shall be drawing from the three main sources, Aristotle, Catholic Social Teaching (CST) and MacIntyre, on which virtue ethics is based. The research question is what ought to be done for financial activities to truly contribute to eudaimonia or human flourishing (Aristotle), to the achievement of three distinct kinds of goods as required of virtue, ¿those internal to practices, those which are the goods of an individual life and those which are the goods of the community¿ (MacIntyre), and to ¿[help] man on the path of salvation¿ in the midst of complex network of relationships in modern societies (CST). These parameters could then be taken as conditions financiers ought to fulfil in order to live the virtues in their work and across different life spheres.
Magazine:
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES-REVUE CANADIENNE DES SCIENCES DE L ADMINISTRATION
ISSN:
0825-0383
Year:
2019
Vol:
36
N°:
3
Pp:
390 - 403
Virtuous leadership is crucial for advancing leadership ethics. By comparing Positive Leadership and its notion of virtuousness with neo¿Aristotelian leadership based on virtue, this article sheds light on this research field. We expound on the differences and commonalities between the two and present possibilities of how they can enrich each other and further ethical leadership theory. Our findings concern the purported Aristotelian roots of virtuousness, the relative strengths and weaknesses of the positive and the neo¿Aristotelian approaches, and the interplay between technical skills and ethical excellence in leadership. We propose the adoption of practical managerial tools and procedures from Positive Leadership, making them dependent upon the virtues to achieve flourishing within organisations and society at large.
Magazine:
BUSINESS ETHICS QUARTERLY
ISSN:
1052-150X
Year:
2018
Vol:
28
N°:
3
Pp:
364 - 368
Magazine:
BUSINESS AND HUMAN RIGHTS JOURNAL
ISSN:
2057-0198
Year:
2018
Vol:
3
N°:
2
Pp:
211 - 232
This article is motivated by certain issues for which, in current Business and Human Rights (BHR) discourse, largely framed in terms of the Ruggie reports, no satisfactory solutions have been found to date. These quandaries refer to (a) foundational matters: the link between human rights law and ethics; (b) normative force: the obligatoriness of human rights claims on corporations; and (c) scope and content of human rights claims on corporations. Turning to the virtue ethics and natural law (VENL) tradition, we encounter the following possible responses: (a) positive laws, such as those concerning human rights, ultimately require a basis in natural law; (b) although the public use of the coercive force of law belongs to the state alone, its private use by non-state actors such as individuals and corporations may be legitimate in some cases; and (c) practical wisdom is necessary in the proper interpretation and implementation of human rights claims on corporations, taking into account relevant contingencies. The blending of BHR discourse with the VENL tradition is best captured in modern Catholic Social Teaching (CST). Although historically CST has adopted the VENL language, engagement with social issues in the modern world has enabled it to reach an understanding with rights theory as well, particularly in connection with business and the economy.
Magazine:
BUSINESS ETHICS QUARTERLY
ISSN:
1052-150X
Year:
2017
Vol:
27
N°:
2
Pp:
327 - 330
Magazine:
JOURNAL OF CATHOLIC SOCIAL THOUGHT
ISSN:
1548-0712
Year:
2016
Vol:
13
N°:
1
Pp:
83-102
Magazine:
BUSINESS ETHICS QUARTERLY
ISSN:
1052-150X
Magazine:
BUSINESS ETHICS: A EUROPEAN REVIEW
ISSN:
0962-8770
Year:
2015
Vol:
24
N°:
S2
Pgs:
S78 - S98
The purpose of this article is to explain the differences between neo-Aristotelian virtue and positive organisational virtuousness from the virtue ethics perspective. Most studies use virtues and virtuousness interchangeably. A few others try to explain their differences from the positive organizational science perspective. Although closely related, we believe that these two notions are not identical. If we understand neo-Aristotelian virtue correctly, then it cannot be judged exclusively on what is externally verifiable, as is the case with virtuousness. For these reasons, we attempt our own differentiation, highlighting the gains and losses realized in the migration from neo-Aristotelian virtue to positive organizational virtuousness, and establishing guideposts to meaningfully combine the strengths of both concepts.
Magazine:
BUSINESS ETHICS: A EUROPEAN REVIEW
ISSN:
0962-8770
Year:
2015
Vol:
24
N°:
S2
Pp:
67 - 78
This paper introduces `Virtue and Virtuousness: When will the twain ever meet?¿ a special edition of Business¿Ethics:A European¿Review. The Call for Papers invited contributions that could inform the relationship between organisational virtuousness, as conceptualised by positive organisation studies, and the classical conception of virtues pertaining to individual women and men. While the resources of particular virtue traditions ¿ Aristotelian, Catholic, Confucian, and the like ¿ could inform their own debates as to whether virtue extends beyond individuals, the discussion between virtue traditions and positive organisation studies has a different dimension. The question is whether the claims of positive social sciences as such are compatible with those of any virtue tradition. We argue that positive social science and virtue traditions are indeed rivals such that adherence to the claims of the one precludes adherence to the other. Resolution to such conflicts requires that one tradition is able to resolve questions that exhaust the resources of the other. This paper suggests that at least one area of incoherence in the findings of positive social sciences can be resolved by virtue traditions, and introduces the remaining papers in the special edition.
Magazine:
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS
ISSN:
0167-4544
Year:
2015
Vol:
128
N°:
4
Pgs:
701 - 703
The paper is the introduction to a selection of papers submitted to the EBEN 25th Annual Conference which took place at IESE Business School in Barcelona from September 20 to 22, 2012. The text presents the rationale behind the program of the Conference, and summarizes the content of the selected papers.
Magazine:
BUSINESS ETHICS: A EUROPEAN REVIEW
ISSN:
0962-8770
Year:
2014
Vol:
23
N°:
4
Pp:
375 - 400
Virtue ethics is generally recognized as one of the three major schools of ethics, but is often sidelined by utilitarianism and deontology in business and management literature. EBSCO and ABI databases were used to look for articles in the Journal of Citation Reports publications between 1980 and 2011 containing the keywords `virtue ethics¿, `virtue theory¿, or `virtuousness¿ in the abstract and `business¿ or `management¿ in the text. The search was refined to draw lists of the most prolific authors, the most cited authors, the most cited articles, and the journals with the most virtue ethics publications. This information allows one to chart how virtue ethics articles have evolved through the decades and to establish `schools¿ or clusters of authors as well as clusters of themes. The results of this quantitative analysis of authors, `schools¿, themes, and publications provide a foundation for the future study of virtue ethics in business and management, identifying its achievements and potentials.
Magazine:
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS
ISSN:
0167-4544
Year:
2013
Vol:
113
N°:
4
Pp:
563-565
An introduction is presented in which the publisher discusses various reports within the issue on topics including philosopher Immanuel Kant's moral philosophy in regards to questions of moral sentiments and staff character, moral decision making models, and corporate transparency.
Magazine:
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS
ISSN:
0167-4544
Year:
2013
Vol:
113
N°:
4
Pp:
611-625
In a previous essay (Sison and Fontrodona ), we defined the common good of the firm as collaborative work, insofar as it provides, first, an opportunity to develop knowledge, skills, virtues, and meaning (work as praxis), and second, inasmuch as it produces goods and services to satisfy society's needs and wants (work as poiesis). We would now like to focus on the participatory aspect of this common good. To do so, we will have to identify the different members of the firm as a community, drawing from corporate citizenship literature and stakeholder theory. Afterward, we will explore both the manner and the intensity of these different members' participation and its impact on the firm's common good.
Magazine:
BUSINESS ETHICS QUARTERLY
ISSN:
1052-150X
Year:
2012
Vol:
22
N°:
2
Pp:
207-210
Virtue ethics, the authors believe, is distinct and superior to other options because it considers, in the first place, which preferences are worth pursuing, rather than just blindly maximizing preferences, and it takes into account intuitions, emotions and experience, instead of acting solely on abstract universal principles. Moreover, virtue ethics is seen as firmly rooted in human biology and psychology, particularly in our freedom, rationality, and sociability. Work, business, and management are presented as vital areas for the development of virtues, not the least with a view to human flourishing. We conclude by introducing the articles included in this special issue.
Magazine:
BUSINESS ETHICS QUARTERLY
ISSN:
1052-150X
Year:
2012
Vol:
22
N°:
2
Pp:
211-246
This article proposes a theory of the firm based on the common good. It clarifies the meaning of the term "common good" tracing its historical development. Next, an analogous sense applicable to the firm is derived from its original context in political theory. Put simply, the common good of the firm is the production of goods and services needed for flourishing, in which different members participate through work. This is linked to the political common good through subsidiarity. Lastly, implications and challenges arising from the positing of work as the common good of the firm are explored.
Magazine:
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS
ISSN:
0167-4544
Year:
2011
Vol:
100
N°:
1
Pp:
3-9
After defining the essential elements of Aristotelian citizenship, the article proposes to apply these criteria in its search for the equivalent of a citizen within the corporate polis. It argues that shareholding managers are the best positioned among a firm's constituents or stakeholders in fulfilling the role of corporate citizens. Greater participation by management not only in the control but also in the ownership of firms brings about benefits for the firm as a whole and for the managers themselves, as organisational citizenship behaviour literature, among others, suggests.
Magazine:
NEW TRENDS
ISSN:
1139-8124
Year:
2011
N°:
81
Pp:
41-44
The article refutes Paul Krugman's claim that the Economics market has no moral significance.
Magazine:
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS
ISSN:
0167-4544
Year:
2011
Vol:
100
N°:
1
Pp:
99-107
Caritas in Veritate (CV) poses a challenge to the business community when it asks for ¿a profoundly new way of understanding business enterprise (CV 40). The paper proposes the concept of the common good as a starting point for the discussion and sketches a definition of the common good of business as the path toward an answer for this challenge. Building on the distinction between the material and the formal parts of the common good, the authors characterize profit as the material part of the common good of business and work as the formal part that expresses the essential significance of business.
Magazine:
NEW TRENDS
ISSN:
1139-8124
Year:
2010
N°:
78
Págs:
28 - 32
Book chapters
Book:
Responsible leadership
Place of Edition:
London
publishing house:
Routledge Taylor and Francis Group
Year:
2022
Ppgs:
245 - 261
This chapter argues that, in place of other dominant forms of leadership, a responsible approach should not emphasize whether leaders are merely rhetorically persuasive or charismatic, but whether they are virtuous. We must understand that Aristotle¿s account of persuasion rests upon rational appeals to morality rather than charismatic arousals of spirit. Toward that end, an Aristotelian construal of servant leadership is framed as a model for how to lead responsibly. The chapter argues that this entails a conjoining of the forces of practical wisdom and technical competence, directed toward the right ends, so that servant leaders always remain in service to (a) the noble goals of the organisation, and (b) the moral development of both themselves and their followers.
Book:
Blockchain: legal aspects of its use.
Place of Edition:
Madrid
publishing house:
Wolters Kluwer - La Ley
Year:
2022
Págs:
105 - 141
Book:
Digital Law Treatise
publishing house:
Law-Wolters Kluver
Year:
2021
Págs:
183 - 191
A comprehensive treatise that systematically analyses the digital transformation in a world of data.
Book:
The SAGE handbook of responsible management learning and education.
Place of Publication:
Thousand Oaks
publishing house:
SAGE Publications Ltd
Year:
2020
Pgs:
280 - 297
This chapter starts by laying out the nature
of the virtues and clarifying their importance
in business. This first segment, apart from
showcasing the evolution of Virtue Ethics in
business and management, explains how the
virtues refer to the `nature¿ and `final end¿ of human beings, applying to a full range of virtues.
of human beings, applying to a full range of
dispositions to action. A careful reading of
Aristotle shows that the virtues, as `character excellences¿, also refer to inclinations and
tendencies, actions and habits, and, indeed,
even lives taken as a whole (Sison, 2003). Through a
focus on moral character building, we aim to
stimulate a lively discussion integrating ethics,
sustainability, and responsibility.
Book:
Ethical business leadership in troubling times
publishing house:
Edward Elgar Publishing
Year:
2019
Pgs:
222 - 235
Ius gentium displays four particular strengths useful in dealing with today's business ethics problems. First, it draws on a personalist understanding of human nature as individual and relational or social, rational and free on equal counts. Second, ius gentium acknowledges that all human beings are born equal, that is, possessing equal rights and freedoms. Third, ius gentium, insofar as it derives from the free exercise of reason by human beings reflecting upon their own nature, requires participation, consensus, or agreement. Fourth, ius gentium is almost unique in tradition for advocating a positive view of business as a force for the common good.
Book:
Business ethics: a virtue ethics and common good approach.
Place of Edition:
London and New York
publishing house:
Routledge, Taylor & Francis Books, Ltd
Year:
2018
Pgs:
xxiii - xxiv
This is the first business ethics textbook to take a virtue ethics approach. It explains how virtue ethics compares with alternative approaches to business ethics, such as utilitarianism and deontology, and argues that virtue ethics best serves the common good of society.
Looking across the whole spectrum of business¿including finance, governance, leadership, marketing and production¿each chapter presents the theory of virtue ethics and supports students¿ learning with chapter objectives, in-depth interviews with professionals and real-life case studies from a wide range of countries.
Business Ethics: A Virtue Ethics and Common Good Approach is a valuable text for advanced undergraduates and masters-level students on business ethics courses.
Book:
Business ethics: a virtue ethics and common good approach.
Place of Edition:
Oxon and New York
publishing house:
Routledge, Taylor & Francis Books, Ltd
Year:
2018
Ppgs:
165 - 186
This is the first business ethics textbook to take a virtue ethics approach. It explains how virtue ethics compares with alternative approaches to business ethics, such as utilitarianism and deontology, and argues that virtue ethics best serves the common good of society.
Looking across the whole spectrum of business¿including finance, governance, leadership, marketing and production¿each chapter presents the theory of virtue ethics and supports students¿ learning with chapter objectives, in-depth interviews with professionals and real-life case studies from a wide range of countries.
Business Ethics: A Virtue Ethics and Common Good Approach is a valuable text for advanced undergraduates and masters-level students on business ethics courses.
Book:
Business ethics: a virtue ethics and common good approach.
Place of Edition:
Oxon and New York
publishing house:
Routledge, Taylor & Francis Books, Ltd
Year:
2018
Pgs:
1 - 23
This is the first business ethics textbook to take a virtue ethics approach. It explains how virtue ethics compares with alternative approaches to business ethics, such as utilitarianism and deontology, and argues that virtue ethics best serves the common good of society.
Looking across the whole spectrum of business¿including finance, governance, leadership, marketing and production¿each chapter presents the theory of virtue ethics and supports students¿ learning with chapter objectives, in-depth interviews with professionals and real-life case studies from a wide range of countries.
Business Ethics: A Virtue Ethics and Common Good Approach is a valuable text for advanced undergraduates and masters-level students on business ethics courses.
Book:
Business ethics: a virtue ethics and common good approach.
Place of Edition:
Oxon and New York
publishing house:
Routledge, Taylor & Francis Books, Ltd
Year:
2018
Ppgs:
51 - 81
This is the first business ethics textbook to take a virtue ethics approach. It explains how virtue ethics compares with alternative approaches to business ethics, such as utilitarianism and deontology, and argues that virtue ethics best serves the common good of society.
Looking across the whole spectrum of business¿including finance, governance, leadership, marketing and production¿each chapter presents the theory of virtue ethics and supports students¿ learning with chapter objectives, in-depth interviews with professionals and real-life case studies from a wide range of countries.
Business Ethics: A Virtue Ethics and Common Good Approach is a valuable text for advanced undergraduates and masters-level students on business ethics courses.
Book:
Handbook of virtue ethics in business and management
Place of Edition:
Dordrecht
publishing house:
Springer Ed.
Year:
2017
Ppgs:
vii - x
Book:
Handbook of virtue ethics in business and management
Place of Edition:
Dordrecht
publishing house:
Springer Ed.
Year:
2017
Ppgs:
1153 - 1161
Book:
The Challenges of Capitalism for Virtue Ethics and the Common Good.
Place of Publication:
Cheltenham, UK/ Northampton, MA, USA.
publishing house:
Edward Elgar Publishing
Year:
2016
Pgs:
93 - 120
The purpose of this chapter is to revisit a series of articles published between 2006 and 2014 on the common-good theory of the firm in the
between 2006 and 2014 on the common-good theory of the firm in the
light of references, commentaries and critiques. I want to show how the
ensuing discussion has helped refine the notion, sharpening its limits,
defining its contours and realising its potential.
Book:
Classical and modern perspectives on virtues in the. business
Place of Edition:
Pamplona
publishing house:
Cuadernos de business y Humanismo. Publications Service of the University of Navarra.
Year:
2015
Págs:
61 - 113
Book:
Of ethics and politics. Concepts, history, institutions
Place of Edition:
Madrid
publishing house:
publishing house Tecnos
Year:
2013
Págs:
257 - 269
Book:
Handbook of the philosophical foundations of business ethics.
Place of Edition:
Dordrecht
publishing house:
Springer
Year:
2012
Ppgs:
45 - 66
Book:
New directions in business ethics
Place of Publication:
New York
publishing house:
SAGE Publications
Year:
2012
Ppgs:
225 - 237
Book:
Corporate Governance and Business Ethics (Ethical Economy. Studies in Economic Ethics and Philosophy).
Place of Edition:
Dordrecht
publishing house:
Springer
Year:
2011
Ppgs:
179-201
Book:
Responsible Investment in Times of Turmoil
Place of Edition:
Dordrecht
publishing house:
SPRINGER
Year:
2011
Pgs:
v-vi
Book:
Dictionary of Philosophy
Place of Edition:
Pamplona
publishing house:
Ediciones Universidad de Navarra (EUNSA)
Year:
2010
Págs:
183-184
Book:
Dictionary of Philosophy
Place of Edition:
Pamplona
publishing house:
University of Navarra Editions (EUNSA)
Year:
2010
Págs:
249-252
Book:
Dictionary of Philosophy
Place of Edition:
Pamplona
publishing house:
University of Navarra Editions (EUNSA)
Year:
2010
Págs:
1157-1160
