In the image
Retouched satellite image of a section of Latin America taken at night by NASA.
The phenomenon whereby, given the size of the European Union market and the particularity of its common regulatory framework , companies outside the EU tend to apply those standards across the board is known as the 'Brussels Effect'. Since they want to sell in the European market and must apply EU standards, it is more beneficial for them to apply those same standards in the different markets they serve.
The question arises as to whether other regions of the world can reproduce or develop their own 'Brussels Effect' as they advance in their integration process. One pending integration, which would give rise to a huge market, would be that of Latin America. How likely would it be to succeed?
The 'Brussels Effect
The success of the 'Brussels Effect' is based on several core topic factors. First, the size and relevance of the European market, which encompasses more than 440 million consumers, makes it an indispensable goal for international companies. Compliance with European regulations is a condition for operating in this market, leading many companies to implement these rules globally to simplify their operations and avoid additional costs. For example, a technology business operating in Europe must adhere to the strict provisions of the General data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Instead of maintaining fragmented policies, companies often apply European regulations in all areas of their operations.
Secondly, European regulations are recognized for their rigor and approach to fundamental rights such as privacy, sustainability and consumer protection. These characteristics not only reinforce their legitimacy, but also make them an attractive model for other regions seeking to improve their regulatory standards. In addition, the extraterritorial reach of some regulations, such as the GDPR, amplifies their influence. This regulation requires any organization that handles European citizens' data to comply with its provisions, no matter where it operates. This forces international players to align their practices with European standards.
The impact of the 'Brussels Effect' is particularly B core topic sectors. In personal data protection, the GDPR has become the global standard, inspiring legislation such as the General data Protection Act (LGPD) in Brazil and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) in California. Technology giants such as Google and Facebook have adapted their global policies to align with these rules and regulations In terms of environmental regulation, the EU is leading the way with initiatives such as the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) and the European Green Pact, which have encouraged global companies to adopt more sustainable practices to remain competitive. For example, automakers have accelerated production of electric vehicles and reduced carbon emissions to meet European requirements . In quality and safety standards, regulations such as REACH, which regulates the use of chemicals, and strict food safety rules have raised international standards, forcing exporters to comply with these requirements in order to access the European market.
Attempts to create a 'common market' in Latin America
In Latin America, organizations such as the Andean Community (CAN) and Mercosur have attempted to emulate the European model , but face significant challenges. This is largely due to the historical fragmentation of the region, which dates back to the finding America. Before the arrival of Europeans, theTahuantinsuyo, known as the Inca Empire, controlled much of South America under a decentralized structure. However, internal divisions, such as the civil war between Huáscar and Atahualpa, facilitated the Spanish conquest in the 16th century. Colonization further divided the territory into viceroyalties, such as Peru and the Río de la Plata.
In the 19th century, struggles for independence promoted ideals of unity that, in the internship, resulted in greater fragmentation. Examples such as the dissolution of Gran Colombia and the Federal Republic of Central America show how internal tensions and local rivalries hindered the construction of modern states. During the 20th century, Latin America faced political instability, military dictatorships and the influence of great powers during the Cold War, which limited its ability to move towards regional integration.
The Andean Community, founded in 1969 with the Cartagena agreement , and Mercosur, created in 1991 by the Treaty of Asunción, have sought to foster economic, political and social cooperation among their members. However, both blocs face structural obstacles. For example, CAN, with institutions such as its Andean Presidential committee and its Court of Justice, has made progress in harmonizing rules and regulations, but economic and political differences among its members have limited its success. Mercosur, for its part, has prioritized the elimination of tariff barriers and the consolidation of a common market, but also faces challenges related to the lack of cohesion and coordination among its members.
Geography/infrastructure
One of the main factors behind the success of the European single market is the connectivity infrastructure that enables the free movement of goods, people and services. The EU has developed a Trans-European Transport network (TEN-T) that facilitates internal trade through high-speed trains, highways and intermodal logistics corridors. In Latin America, on the other hand, geography represents a structural obstacle. While Mercosur has a more favorable orography compared to CAN, the lack of investment in infrastructure has led to economic fragmentation.
In the case of the Andean Community of Nations (CAN), the Andes Mountains and the Amazon make physical integration among its members difficult, increasing logistics costs and limiting intra-regional trade. According to the Inter-American development Bank (IDB), logistics costs in Latin America represent, on average, between 18% and 35% of the value of the exported product, while in the EU they range between 8% and 10% (IDB, 2021). This difference is critical: the lack of efficient infrastructure makes regional trade more expensive and reinforces Latin America's dependence on extra-regional markets, instead of consolidating internal value chains.
Mercosur, despite its more accessible geography, faces similar problems. The absence of an efficient rail network and dependence on road transport raise logistics costs and reduce the competitiveness of products within the bloc. Unlike the EU, which has implemented territorial cohesion policies to mitigate economic inequalities among its regions, in Latin America there are no effective mechanisms to balance asymmetries in infrastructure. This shows that, without connectivity investment, any attempt to strengthen intra-regional trade will face structural barriers that will be difficult to overcome.
Institutions
If infrastructure is a structural problem, institutional weakness is the real Achilles heel of Latin American integration. Unlike the EU, which has developed supranational institutions with binding capacity, Mercosur and CAN operate under intergovernmental schemes where decisions depend on the will of the member states. In the EU, bodies such as the European Commission and the Court of Justice guarantee the uniform application of regulations, while in Latin America there are no effective enforcement mechanisms.
Added to this lack of institutionality is an even more serious problem: systemic corruption, which has weakened both confidence in governments and the viability of integration projects. The Odebrecht case is a clear example of the devastating impact that corruption has had on development and integration processes in the region. The Brazilian construction company paid bribes in at least 12 Latin American countries to obtain infrastructure contracts, including members of Mercosur and the Andean Community of Nations (CAN). In Peru, the scandal led to the prosecution of former presidents such as Alejandro Toledo, Ollanta Humala, Pedro Pablo Kuczynski and Alan García (who committed suicide in 2019 in the middle of the research). In Brazil, Operation Lava Jato dismantled a corruption network involving high-level officials and businessmen. In Ecuador, former vice-president Jorge Glas was convicted of receiving bribes from the business.
Odebrecht's impact goes beyond politics: it destabilized economies and paralyzed core topic infrastructure projects that were fundamental for regional integration. According to the Brazilian Public Prosecutor's Office, the business paid more than US$ 788 million in bribes, affecting transportation and energy projects that would have improved connectivity in Latin America. In the EU, the existence of control and transparency bodies has made it possible to mitigate corruption at the community level, while in Latin America the lack of a solid institutional framework has turned corruption into a recurrent obstacle for the development of integration projects.
Common/shared values
Another core topic in the success of the Brussels Effect is the existence of common values that have allowed the cohesion of the bloc. The EU was built on principles of democracy, rule of law and human rights, consolidating a European identity that has served as the basis for its political and economic integration. In Latin America, on the other hand, historical fragmentation and differences in political models have made it difficult to construct a unifying narrative.
While the EU emerged as a response to the conflicts of the twentieth century, Latin America has not had a catalyzing event to drive regional cooperation with the same force. The dissolution of Greater Colombia and the Federal Republic of Central America show that the region has historically faced difficulties in consolidating lasting integration projects. In addition, recurrent political crises and economic instability have led countries to prioritize their national agendas over regional objectives, which has weakened the possibility of developing a true South American or Andean citizenship, similar to the European identity.
Is it possible to adapt the European model to Latin America?
The comparison between the EU and Latin America makes it clear that the Brussels Effect is not easily replicable in the region. Differences in infrastructure, institutionality and shared values have made integration attempts in Mercosur and CAN limited and fragmented. In order for Latin America to strengthen its integration process and project regulatory influence, deep structural reforms would be necessary: investing in connectivity, strengthening institutions with supranational power, establishing effective corruption control mechanisms and building a regional identity based on common values.
Without these changes, Latin America will continue to operate as a series of isolated economies unable to compete globally. The EU has demonstrated that successful integration requires not only trade agreements, but also a commitment to sound political and economic principles. The core topic question is whether Latin America has the political will to adopt these principles or whether its structural limitations will continue to perpetuate its fragmentation. Could a bloc like Mercosur develop supranational institutions with real power? Is a strategy of territorial cohesion in Latin America similar to that of the EU viable? And, more importantly, how could the problem of corruption be addressed to prevent new cases such as Odebrecht from further weakening regional integration?
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Bradford, A. (2021). The European Union in a globalised world: the "Brussels effect". Pages 75-79.
Herrera, J.-N., & Rotaru, V. (2021, March 26). Thinking the European Union in globalization: the 'Brussels effect'. TheGrand Continent. https://legrandcontinent.eu/es/2021/03/26/union-europea-globalizacion-efecto-bruselas/
Perez, O. (2021, September 28). The Brussels Effect: the international projection of the European Union. exoap.
https://exoap.com/efecto-bruselas/
Geopolitique (n.d.). The European Union in a globalised world: the Brussels effect.https://geopolitique.eu/en/articles/the-european-union-in-a-globalised-world-the-brussels- effect/
Ramírez, S. (2008). Las Zonas de Integración Fronteriza de la Comunidad Andina: Comparación de sus alcances. programs of study Políticos, 32, Instituto de programs of study Políticos, Universidad de Antioquia, (pp. 135-169).
Institute of International Relations (IRI) (2003). Quirama Declaration. Revista Relaciones Internacionales - Nº 25 (Digital Segment), Documents Section.https://www.iri.edu.ar/revistas/revista_dvd/revistas/R25/ri%2025%20doc%20CAN.pdf
Blanco Alvarado, C. (2014). The crisis of the Andean Community. Revista de Derecho Público, 32(2).
http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?pid=S0121-86972014000200002&script=sci_arttext