Foreign misinformation: Chinese campaigns in East and Southeast Asia vs in some other countries

Cyberspace is becoming the battlefield of many conflicts in the 21st century. average and information are perhaps one of the most menacing weapons, something that comes with no surprises in today's world. Unfortunately, average control and distortion of information is a common practice that may be attributed to many state actors.

Although each country has the right to portray its own narratives which more often than not serve their interests, this practice is different from manipulating and misconstruing information environments. A practice long attributed to authoritarian states such as the People's Republic of China (PRC) and its 'Great Firewall' domestic restrictions on the internet. Notwithstanding the reproachable nature of this practice that no state should inflict upon their domestic population, in recent years, the international community has become increasingly concerned, due to attempts from the PRC at shaping the information environments at a regional and even global scale and promoting 'digital authoritarianism.'

The term 'misinformation campaigns' refers to a series of mechanisms employed by the PRC, including the spreading of false and misconstructed information, spreading of pro-Beijing propaganda from state-controlled average, censoring of critical voices against the regime, usage of trolls and bots on social average to suppress information that it conceives contrary to its narrative, among other techniques that can be categorized as legally and morally ambiguous to state the least.

These misinformation campaigns, although of recent export into the global arena, have shaped the political and mediatic domestic narrative of the PRC for a long time. Throughout the last decades and under the rule of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) the Chinese population has endured an extreme censorship regime. A regime that has been toughened since President Xi Jinping entered power. Although this regime of control had only been enforced by the CCP internally, it is believed that since 2017 (when allegedly the first trans-national misinformation campaign was developed) the PRC has exported this practice and throughout the years it has been intensified and the PRC has been successfully improving and adapting these techniques. Although there is no specific figure, it is believed that Beijing invests billions of dollars yearly in the funding of these campaigns. Although these efforts have been employed through different media such as academia, partner governments and civil society organizations, it can be argued that the most prominent method through which these efforts are achieved is through average and the digital space.

These new activities of the Chinese government have not gone unnoticed by the international community. On September 28, 2023, Washington officially addressed the issue of Chinese Global disinformation campaigns through a special report by the Global Engagement Center at the US Department of State, titled 'How the People's Republic of China Seeks to Reshape the Global Information Environment.' This 63-page report systematically examines the Chinese disinformation campaigns, their tactics, modus operandi, implications, and consequences. According to the report, Beijing employs mainly five elements, namely: leveraging propaganda and censorship, promoting digital authoritarianism, exploiting international organizations and bilateral partnerships, pairing cooptation and pressure, and exercising control of Chinese-language average.

This analysis aims to showcase and analyze how the People's Republic of China is actively trying to control and shape average and information environments and reshape global narratives through so-called misinformation campaigns. The objective is also to compare and contrast how these practices take place in East and Southeast Asian countries versus the rest of the world.

Misinformation campaigns in East and Southeast Asia

East and Southeast Asia are without a doubt the regions in the world where the spreading of misinformation campaigns by the PRC are most prominent due to the continuous pressure and influence that Beijing constantly exercises upon its neighbors. The first-ever registered attempt by the PRC at pushing its misinformation campaigns outside of mainland China was recorded in 2019 in the wake of Hong Kong protests. However, as previously mentioned, although of recent export, these practices carried out by the PRC have been employed in many East and Southeast Asian countries. Practices that appear to be more prominent in countries such as Taiwan and others in the region where China has active territorial disputes, namely: Japan, Vietnam, Malaysia, and the Philippines, among others.

Taiwan

To say that the relationship and dynamic between the PRC and Taiwan is complicated is an understatement of the magnitude of the dispute that these countries have had since the last century. The PRC claims Taiwan as one of its provinces and in the last decade its claims to Taiwan have intensified. Due to its interest in Taiwan and the fact that Beijing believes to have a 'legitimate' claim to it, the PRC is constantly exerting pressure on Taiwan. The PRC can achieve this through diverse soft and hard power techniques and mechanisms. One of these mechanisms is through its misinformation campaigns.

Taiwan held its most recent presidential elections in January 2024. The election was contested between Lai Ching-te from the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) who supports the independence of Taiwan, and Hou Yu-ih from the Kuomintang Party, which the PRC is more inclined to. Joseph Wu (Taiwan's Foreign minister) stated that China had launched interference efforts at every election since Taiwan democratized. Many civil rights groups denounced the flooding of misinformation campaigns carried out by the PRC through social average platforms in the wake of Taiwan's elections. According to these groups, through fake news and false information, the PRC tried to create an unfavorable image of the DPP candidate, using techniques such as spreading rumors that Hsiao Bi-khim (Lai Ching-te running mate) was a US born citizen and not Taiwanese through various social average platforms.

This is not an isolated event; for example, the PRC has been accused of influencing and amplifying dissenting voices of Taiwanese citizens and civil groups to fuel civil unrest and discontent among the Taiwanese population. Moreover, since 2013, Taiwan has been ranked as the country most targeted by false information. Another example of the PRC misinformation campaigns in Taiwan took place in 2018 when the PRC allegedly spread the rumor through social average that the Tsai administration (DPP) was going to ban the burning of traditional incense due to environmental and climate change concerns. This sparked protests in Taipei with protestors claiming that the Tsai administration was disrespecting the cultural and religious traditions of Buddhists and Taoists.

Disputes in Southeast Asia over the South China Sea

One of the most contentious and ongoing international disputes that the PRC currently has regarding its territorial claims is on the South China Sea and its claim of the 'Nine-dash line.' This dispute encompasses a concurrence of maritime claims between China and some countries in the East and Southeast Asian region, namely: Taiwan, Brunei, Malaysia, The Philippines and Vietnam. For this reason, the PRC has carried out a series of heavy misinformation campaigns in terms of historical revisionism, influencing the internal politics of countries in the dispute and favoring politicians that are more lenient towards the PRC and through social average campaigns that favor the PRC's view on the conflict via bots and fake accounts.

A clear example of this attempt was evidenced when in 2023, the Philippines Coast Guard denounced that the PRC was carrying out a misinformation campaign with the aim of downplaying the Chinese naval belligerence on Philippines waters which they claim as their Exclusive Economic Zone.

Moreover, the PRC's misinformation campaigns in relation to the South China Sea are evidenced in the pushing forward of historical revisionism regarding their historical claims to many islands. The most contentious islands disputed by China under their historical claims are the Spratly Islands and the Paracel Islands. Through the usage of historical maps and historical references, the PRC aims to shape the narrative and perspective of their conflict by completely disregarding international law and pivotal treaties such as the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Although the permanent court of arbitration ruled in favor of the Philippines in 2016, due to the lack of legal basis that China had regarding its claims of the Philippines' territorial waters, the PRC has dismissed these findings and argues that its right to the nine-dash line in the South China Sea is rooted in historical claims and is not fond of the dispute being resolved through the legal route.

Misinformation campaigns in the world

Chinese misinformation campaigns do not stop at the regional level, the PRC has been able to successfully export their tactics to almost every region of the world. Although their efforts at a global level are scattered around the map, there is an evident outstanding target, the United States.

United States

In the last couple of years, the United States has been a relentless victim of Chinese misinformation campaigns. The most recent instance of these misinformation campaigns was uncovered in 2023 by a special CNN report which accused the PRC of directing attacks through various social average platforms targeted at some American citizens which the Chinese government deems as critics of the regime. For example, Chinese American Jiayang Fan, who is a writer for 'The New Yorker', was one of the targets of the most recent misinformation campaign. She was subjected to spamming on her social average with messages telling her to "kill herself" and she received over 12,000 tweets calling her a "traitor". The reason why she was chosen as a target by the PRC was because she covered the 2019 Pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong. Professor Darren Linville from Clemson's average Forensic Hub claims that this coordinated attack could be considered one of the biggest disinformation campaigns ever launched by the PRC. This massive intimidation campaign has not been an isolated event, other American critics of the Chinese regime such as Chen Pokong, a Chinese American columnist and Jiajun Qiu, a Chinese pro-democracy youtuber who fled China and is currently living in the US, have also been subject to of these vicious attacks.

Eastern Europe

Although many of China's misinformation campaigns regarding technology and cyberspace seem to be dominated by efforts carried through social average, they go beyond. This can be clearly exemplified when in 2021 Lithuania's Defense Ministry advised its citizens to refrain from buying and getting rid of "Chinese phones". The reason behind the recommendation was a report published by Lithuania's National Security Center, which determined that phones manufactured by the Chinese technology company Xiaomi had built-in censorship capabilities that banned a list of around 449 phrases, among them "Free Tibet" or "Long live Taiwan independence." Moreover, although this built-in censorship software was allegedly deactivated for the EU region, it is a feature that could be activated remotely at any moment, meaning that at any point the users could endure censorship without their knowledge or consent.

Comparison

After reading and analyzing extensive literature and seeing the most prominent methods and case studies in East and Southeast Asia compared to the rest of the world, there is a clear difference in the tactics, efforts, and ways in which the PRC pushes its narratives and modifies the information environments. In East Asian and Southeast Asian countries, there is a clear preoccupation with shaping the political ideals of these countries as well as influencing the political outcomes by supporting and amplifying the campaigns and interests of pro-China candidates and distorting the narratives and history of many disputed territories between the PRC and the rest of East and Southeast Asia, something that becomes crystal clear when looking at the case study of the South China sea. On the other hand, Chinese misinformation campaigns in the rest of the world aim at improving the international perception of the PRC, and at the same time seek to sabotage and misconstrue the perception of many of its Western rivals, primarily the United States, intending to strengthen its relationships with many members of the international community, especially with countries in the Global South.

Overall, there is severe overarching pressure placed by the PRC in the East and Southeast Asian regions, something that is logically explained by the proximity, the shared history, past imperial ambitions (e.g. Chinese tributary state system), Chinese aims at becoming a regional hegemon and its ongoing territorial disputes in the region.

The overt interconnectedness in which we live today has opened the possibility for people to get access to information from every corner of the globe. This is without a doubt one of the biggest achievements of globalization. Unfortunately, this has come with a lot of challenges including the ever-growing waves of fake news and disinformation that flood cyberspace. For this reason, the future steps that the international community should take in relation to average and information are to ensure that the rules and ideals promoted by civil society and the rule of law are maintained and respected even in intangible spaces such as cyberspace. This is not an easy task, but it is extremely pivotal and will require worldwide cooperation.