Foto principal - Procesos de Mejora

Improvement Processes

Aplicaciones anidadas

Aplicaciones anidadas

Home_Seccion_Procesos

Ruta de navegación

Aplicaciones anidadas

Frase de Procesos de mejora

One of the main objectives of the Planning and Improvement Service of the teaching of the University of Navarra is promote a culture of quality among the members of the university community for the continuous improvement of the teaching university.

Aplicaciones anidadas

Aplicaciones anidadas

Manual de Calidades y Procesos Título

guide Quality and Processes

Botón Manual SAIC

Mapa de procesos

Aplicaciones anidadas

Comisión de Garantía de Calidad, Título y presentación

Quality Assurance Committee (QAC)

DESCRIPTION

The Quality Assurance Committee (CGC) is the body delegated by the center's board to plan and monitor processes in accordance with SAIC requirements. The board of directors appoints and approves the composition of the CGC based on the center's educational offerings and its own idiosyncrasies.

COMPOSITION
Associate Dean or Deputy Director of Office of Academic Affairs President
Associate Dean or Deputy Director manager doctorate Programs Vice President
Qualitycoordinator Secretary
Member of the Planning and Improvement Service of the teaching board member
faculty representative for faculty center board member
Student representative on the Degree board member
Master's Degree Student Representative board member
doctorate student representative board member
PAS representative board member
Representative of employers and graduates board member
FUNCTIONS

• Propose the center's quality objectives, aligned with those of the University, and submit them to the board for approval.

• Oversee the implementation of the SAIC at the center and its degree programs, ensuring compliance with guide , the quality policy, and the regulatory requirements for verification, monitoring, and accreditation.

• Propose changes and improvements to the SAIC to the SPyMD.

• Review and follow up on reports analyzing results and plans for improving degrees.

• Develop and monitor improvement plans resulting from the internal audit of the SPyMD.

Aplicaciones anidadas

Composición CECA

Commission for Quality assessment and accreditation (CECA)

DESCRIPTION

The assessment and accreditation Committee accreditation CECA) is the body representing the centers, the Office of the Executive Council the various stakeholders for the supervision of the implementation of the SAIC in the centers.

COMPOSITION
Vice President of Office of Academic Affairs President
Vice President of faculty Vice President
Director of the teaching Planning and Improvement Service Secretary
Associate Dean Deputy Director appointed by each center board member
Representative of the doctorate School board member
student body representative board member
faculty representative board member
staff and Services staff (ASS) Representative board member
Graduate representative board member
Employer representative board member

The quality coordinators of the centers may also attend , with voice, but without vote in the decisions of the Commission.

FUNCTIONS

• approve review the Quality Policy and quality objectives of the University of Navarra.

• Receive proposals on the initial definition and subsequent updates of the Quality Policy and Objectives formulated by the quality assurance committees and the various stakeholders. These proposals are channeled through the teaching Planning and Improvement Service teaching SPyMD).

• approve SAIC and its reference letter documentation.

• Monitor the University's Internal Quality Assurance System.

• Ensure that the necessary processes for the development the University's SAIC are established, implemented, and maintained.

• Ensure that appropriate information is disseminated among all University stakeholders.

The CECA meets at least once a year and whenever convened by the chair. certificate are taken at each meeting.

For the agreements made by this committee to be valid, at least the following must be present: a Vice President, a director from the teaching Planning and Improvement Service teaching half of the remaining members.

Indicadores y resultados_general_desplegable

Indicators and results

Course 22-23

DATA

issue of official degrees: 91

Center improvement plans approved by center boards of directors: 1018

issue of verifications: 4

issue of modifications: 13

issue of accreditations: 15

overall satisfaction average of the student body with the degree scroll UN: 3.89 / 5

overall faculty satisfaction average with degree scroll UN: 4.12 / 5

average Degree of satisfaction of the student body with the faculty UN: 4.23 / 5

Media de porcentaje de asignaturas evaluadas con una media <3,5 en el ítem 1 UN: 15.35%

average of the percentage of doctoral students approved in the follow-up process: 91.91%.

issue of thesis defended: 146

fees SIIU (course 21/22)

fees

Latest SIIU fees available from the University of Navarra (academic year 21/22):

average performance rate UN: 94.68%.

average success rate UN: 96.16%.

average assessment rate UN: 98.46%.

Aplicaciones anidadas

¿En qué podemos ayudarte? Haz un parte

How can we help you?

+

¿Alguna mejora? Déjanos un mensaje en el buzón de sugerencias

Any improvement? Leave us a message in the suggestion box

+