Ruta de navegación

Aplicaciones anidadas

Conoce_Calidad_Texto

Quality

The School of Medicine of the University of Navarra considers it essential to guarantee the quality of the degrees and services it offers.

The School of Medicine considers it essential to guarantee the quality of the degrees and services it offers. goal To this end, the university has implemented an Internal Quality Assurance System (SAIC) with the aim of monitoring and continually reviewing its degrees. This systematically covers the activities that the School carries out in order to promote the quality and continuous improvement of all the official qualifications (Degree, masters and doctorate) and the services it offers.

The School of Medicine has a Quality Assurance Committee, which is responsible for promoting and supervising the quality management system.

By incorporating review and continuous improvement strategies, School aims to develop and monitor its actions, review and redefine them according to the needs and expectations of its stakeholders.

Publicador de contenidos

Visor de contenido web (Global)

Quality Assurance System

Calidad_Desplegable_Comision

Resultados de satisfacción

Satisfaction results

Resultados de satisfacción- desplegable

Visor de contenido web (Global)

Official Documentation of the Degrees

Calidad_Desplegable_Documentacion

Date

Document

06/05/2008

report definitive verification of degree scroll dated 06/05/08

28/05/2008

Resolution of the committee of Universities after the verification dated 28/05/08

23/02/2009

Publication of Study program in the BOE after the verification dated 02/23/09

20/09/2012

report monitoring MONITOR

01/03/2015

report monitoring MONITOR

30/04/2015

report definitive of the assessment on the proposal of MODIFICATION of Study program

May 15, 2015

report self-assessment ACCREDITA Gr. In Medicine

26/06/2015

report definitive of the assessment on the proposal of MODIFICATION of Study program

September 23, 2015

Favorable Resolution of the committee of Universities, ascription to Level 3 (Master's Degree) Gr. in Medicine

March 21, 2016

Improvement plan for Medicine (response to the provisional the renewal of the accreditation )

April 27, 2016

report final assessment for renewal of the accreditation

14/06/2016

Resolution committee of Univ. Of renewal of the accreditation Gr. In Medicine

10/07/2017

report definitive of the assessment on the proposal of MODIFICATION of Study program

09/03/2018

report definitive of the assessment on the proposal of MODIFICATION of Study program

July 15, 2020

report of verification

27/11/2020

report end of the assessment of the application of VERIFICATION of the official Study program

04/03/2021

BOE

26/03/2021

Publication of Study program in the BOE after the verification dated 26/03/21

January 22, 2022

Resolution committee of Universities

May 10, 2022

report of the visit assessment to obtain the international seal of quality (SIC) WFME of Medicine.

June 15, 2022

report final assessment to obtain the WFME International Quality Seal (SIC) for Medicine.

11/10/2022

certificate of the WFME international seal of quality (SIC) of Medicine

09/03/2026

report on theDegree Medicine Study program 20

09/03/2026

assessment report assessment National Agency for Assessment of Quality and Accreditation the modification ofDegree Study program Degree Medicine 20

Competences of Degree (.pdf)

  • report (January 13, 2026)

  • report (11/03/2021)
    If you would like to express your opinion about its content or the implementation of the doctoral program, please clickhere.

Conoce_Calidad_Buzon_Titulo

Calidad_Buzon

normas-buzon

Operating rules:

→ The processing of the information received is completely confidential.
→ Only those data provided by users of the suggestion box that are respectful, truthful, accurate, complete and up to date will be taken into account.
→ The manager of supervising the mailbox forwards the suggestions, claims, complaints and congratulations received to the manager of each process (according to annex 3 of PE1).
→ The manager of each process responds to the Username to the sender's email address and also assesses the inclusion of the complaint or suggestion in the corresponding results analysis report .