Quality
School of Humanities and Social Sciences considers it essential to guarantee the quality of the degrees and services it offers. goal To this end, the university has implemented an Internal Quality Assurance System (SAIC) with the aim of monitoring and continually reviewing its degrees. This systematically covers the activities that the School carries out in order to promote the quality and continuous improvement of all the official qualifications (Degree, Master's Degree and doctorate) and the services it offers.
The School of Humanities and Social Sciences has a Quality Assurance CommitteeThe management quality assurance system is promoted and supervised by the .
By incorporating review and continuous improvement strategies, School aims to develop and monitor its actions, review and redefine them according to the needs and expectations of its stakeholders.
Quality Assurance System
The Commission appointed to develop the Internal Quality Assurance System (SGIC) of the School of Philosophy and Letters is composed of professors, students and staff administrative staff of the academic center.
-
coordinator CGC: Ms. Purificación Díez Goñi
-
Quality and Innovation Service: Ms. Lourdes Zumaquero Manchado
-
Representative of academic staff: Mr. Mr. Alvaro Ferrary Ojeda
-
PAS Representative: Mr. Ignacio Cristóbal Urbicain (General Manager)
-
Student representative of postgraduate program: Ms. Teresa Reina Uribe
-
administrative assistantMs. Pía d'Ors Lois
-
Vice-Dean of Office of Academic Affairs: Ms. Cristina Tabernero conference room
-
Alumni and Employer Representative: Ms. Cristina Terroba Serrano
Satisfaction results
Official documentation of diplomas
|
Dates |
Document |
|
1-VI-2009 |
Registration in the Register of Universities, Centres and Degrees |
|
2011 |
|
|
10-VI-2009 |
|
|
22-VI-2009 |
|
|
4-IX-2009 |
agreement with the committee of Ministers which establishes the official character of the title |
|
FEB 8, 2010 |
|
|
26-XII-2013 |
report Modifies (National Agency for Assessment of Quality and Accreditation) |
|
1-III-2015 |
report Monitor (National Agency for Assessment of Quality and Accreditation) |
|
4-VI-2015 |
|
|
1-VII-2016 |
|
|
6-IV-2017 |
report of Accreditation (National Agency for Assessment of Quality and Accreditation) |
|
8-V-2017 |
Resolution on the renewal of Accreditation of committee of Universities |
|
Dates |
Document |
|
8-VII-2015 |
Registration in the Register of Universities, Centres and Degrees |
|
13-VI-2014 |
|
|
29-IV-2015 |
|
|
8-VII-2015 |
|
|
25-IX-2015 |
agreement with the committee of Ministers which establishes the official character of the title |
|
13-XI-2015 |
|
|
10-XII-2018 |
|
|
25-XI-2020 |
report of Accreditation (National Agency for Assessment of Quality and Accreditation) |
|
22-I-2021 |
Resolution on the renewal of Accreditation of committee of Universities |
|
Dates |
Document |
|
|
Registration in the Register of Universities, Centres and Degrees |
|
31-VIII-2017 |
|
|
11-XII-2017 |
|
|
23-II-2018 |
|
|
20-IV-2018 |
agreement with the committee of Ministers which establishes the official character of the title |
|
21-VI-2018 |
|
|
22-II-2022 |
|
|
19-IV-2024 |
report final assessment for renewal of the accreditation (.pdf) |
|
7-VI-2024 |
Resolution of the renewal accreditation of the committee of Universities (.pdf) |
|
Dates |
Document |
|
30-IV-2015 |
Registration in the Register of Universities, Centres and Degrees |
|
24-VI-2014 |
|
|
12-III-2015 |
|
|
30-IV-2015 |
|
|
12-VI-2015 |
agreement with the committee of Ministers which establishes the official character of the title |
|
17-IX-2015 |
|
|
10-XII-2018 |
|
|
28-IV-2020 |
|
|
25-XI-2020 |
|
|
22-I-2021 |
Resolution on the renewal of Accreditation of committee of Universities |
|
Dates |
Document |
|
1-VI-2009 |
Registration in the Register of Universities, Centres and Degrees |
|
16-II-2015 |
|
|
21-V-2015 |
|
|
5-VI-2009 |
|
|
4-IX-2009 |
agreement with the committee of Ministers which establishes the official character of the title |
|
FEB 8, 2010 |
|
|
23-IX-2013 |
report Modifies (National Agency for Assessment of Quality and Accreditation) |
|
20-IX-2012 |
report Monitor (National Agency for Assessment of Quality and Accreditation) |
|
21-V-2015 |
report Modifies (National Agency for Assessment of Quality and Accreditation) |
|
1-III-2015 |
report Monitor (National Agency for Assessment of Quality and Accreditation) |
|
1-VII-2016 |
|
|
6-IV-2017 |
report of Accreditation (National Agency for Assessment of Quality and Accreditation) |
|
8-V-2017 |
Resolution on the renewal of Accreditation of committee of Universities |
|
Dates |
Document |
|
|
Registration in the Register of Universities, Centres and Degrees |
|
28-IV-2022 |
|
|
27-V-2022 |
|
|
27- VI-2022 |
|
|
21-X-2022 |
agreement with the committee of Ministers which establishes the official character of the title |
|
14-XI-2022 |
|
Dates |
Document |
|
21-III-2017 |
Registration in the Register of Universities, Centres and Degrees |
|
2-IX-2016 |
|
|
3-I-2017 |
|
|
21-III-2017 |
|
|
5-V-2017 |
agreement with the committee of Ministers which establishes the official character of the title |
|
7-VII-2017 |
|
|
12-II-2021 |
report Monitor (National Agency for Assessment of Quality and Accreditation) |
|
Dates |
Document |
|
8-V-2017 |
Registration in the Register of Universities, Centres and Degrees |
|
3-XI-2016 |
|
|
13-III-2017 |
|
|
8-V-2017 |
|
|
29-IX-2017 |
agreement with the committee of Ministers which establishes the official character of the title |
|
13-XI-2017 |
|
|
15-VII-2019 |
|
|
28-V-2020 |
|
|
24-II-2021 |
report of Accreditation (National Agency for Assessment of Quality and Accreditation) |
|
11-III-2021 |
Resolution on the renewal of Accreditation of committee of Universities |
Documentation of the verification process:
Resolution of the committee of Universities
report for the request for verification
Documentation of the accredited specialization Excellence process:
Resolution of the Ministry of Education
Data included in the application for a Commendation of Excellence ( report of application for Excellence)
Documentation of the process at accreditation:
Documentation of the verification process:
report for the request for verification
Description of the equipment research
Documentation of the process at accreditation:
Operating rules:
→ The processing of the information received is completely confidential.
→ Only those data provided by users of the suggestion box that are respectful, truthful, accurate, complete and up to date will be taken into account.
→ The manager of supervising the mailbox forwards the suggestions, claims, complaints and congratulations received to the manager of each process (according to annex 3 of PE1).
→ The manager of each process responds to the Username to the sender's email address and also assesses the inclusion of the complaint or suggestion in the corresponding results analysis report .