Can Philosophy be a natural science? On the project naturalisation of reason

Can Philosophy be a natural science? The project of naturalisation of reason.

seminar from group Science, Reason and Faith.
Enrique Moros. Pamplona, June 18, 2013.

News

Enrique Moros holds graduate Philosophy from the Faculty of Philosophy and the Ecclesiastical School of Philosophy the University of Navarra, with award for licentiate degree; a Ph.D. in Philosophy from the Ecclesiastical School of Philosophy the University of Navarra, with award for doctorate; and a doctorate from the Faculty of Philosophy at the University of Navarra. He is currently a professor at the Ecclesiastical School of Philosophy Director research that faculty.

summary:

Since Quine's critique of the distinction between a priori and a posteriori, what he called naturalised epistemology became widespread: the project of substituting Philosophy for the natural sciences. Men have only one reason and the way it works well, as experience shows, is the way it does in the natural sciences. We must therefore elaborate all knowledge as a continuum of natural science. This /desideratum/ is especially present in the so-called neurosciences. But is it possible to fulfil this goal? Is there any internal limit to natural science that prevents its universalisation? In a more positive formulation, what do scientists need that natural science does not provide? And who should be entrusted with the task of meeting human needs? What is the role of human reason in this task?